How this works
This page is for anyone who wants to understand the work before deciding whether to start. It covers the thinking behind the approach, what happens in sessions, and what most people take from it. The free thirty minute conversation is there when you are ready.
Why the thinking keeps returning
Most people who reach this page are not struggling in an obvious way. They are functioning but carrying a persistent sense that something is unresolved. The same questions keep surfacing. The same decisions keep being deferred.
Most approaches to persistent thinking treat it as a thinking problem. The solution is usually to challenge the thoughts and replace them with more balanced ones. That works for some people. For others the thinking returns regardless, because what is driving it was never properly examined.
Rumination of this kind is rarely random. It tends to cluster around the same themes: direction, identity, purpose, or the gap between how a person is living and what they actually value. The mind returns because something has not been properly examined. That is what this work addresses.
The philosophical foundations
The framework draws on three philosophical traditions. Each does a specific job, addressing a different part of the process.
-
Absurdism is used as a distancing mechanism. Before a situation can be examined, it needs to be seen without full emotional investment. Camus's position, that life offers no inherent justification and must be engaged with anyway, produces a kind of dark humour that creates space between a person and their immediate reaction. That space is where the examination begins.
-
Stoic philosophy provides the method for what comes next. Not the popular reduction of stoicism to tolerating difficulty without complaint, but the disciplined practice of honest self-examination. The questions the Stoics considered worth sitting with: what you actually value, what is within your reach, what the current situation is costing you, and whether what you are pursuing is worth what it demands.
-
Frankl's logotherapy provides the direction. His argument, developed partly from Nietzsche's observation that a person who has a reason to live can bear almost any how, is that progress becomes possible when there is something to move toward. The aim at this stage is not to prescribe a purpose but to clarify what is already present and what can be built from it.
The process
The Reflective Agency Model is the framework used in every session. It was developed through working with people who think deeply and find the same patterns returning regardless of what changes around them.
It moves through five stages. Each one addresses something specific, from the first signal that something is off to a clear direction grounded in what you actually value.
The aim is not to arrive at a conclusion decided in advance, but to reach a point where you understand your own thinking well enough to act from it.
-
Something feels misaligned but you cannot name it precisely yet. This is not a sign that something is wrong with you. It is the first signal that your current situation and your actual values are no longer pointing in the same direction. We start here because this is where the thinking begins.
-
The mind returns to the same territory repeatedly because it is attempting to resolve something it does not yet have the tools to resolve. This is not a failure of willpower or discipline. It is reflection without direction, and it is the most common reason people arrive at this work.
-
This is where the real work begins. Rather than challenging the thoughts directly, we look at what is underneath them. What the thinking is protecting, what it is avoiding, and what it is actually trying to tell you. Most people find this stage clarifying in a way that cognitive approaches alone do not reach.
-
Not certainty, and not resolution of every question. Clarity here means a precise enough understanding of what you value and what you need that you can begin to make decisions from that place rather than from anxiety or habit.
-
Decisions made from clarity hold up differently than decisions made from pressure. This stage is about translating what you now understand into action that is yours. The aim is not a plan imposed from outside. It is a direction that makes sense given everything you know about yourself.
What happens in sessions.
Sessions are sixty minutes, conducted online. Weekly tends to work best for most people as it keeps the thinking moving between sessions. How often we meet is always up to you.
You do not need to arrive with anything prepared. What you bring is whatever is present for you at that point, the thinking that has been circling, the decisions you are sitting with, the questions that keep returning. The structure of the session creates the direction from there.
Most people work with me for between six and twelve sessions. Some need less. The length is determined by the work, not by a fixed programme. When the thinking has shifted and you have a clear enough sense of direction to move forward on your own, that is when we stop.
What you leave with
The aim of this work is not to resolve every question or to arrive at a version of your life that no longer requires thought. That is not what clarity means here. What changes is the relationship between the thinking and the decision. The loops become less consuming because they are pointing somewhere rather than circling.
Most people finish this work with a clearer sense of what they actually value, as distinct from what they have been told to value or what anxiety has been driving them toward. That clarity does not make every decision easy. It makes the decisions feel like yours.
The second thing people take away is a way of working through difficulty that does not depend on coming back. The tools and the process become something you can use independently. The aim was never to create a reliance on the work. It was to make the work unnecessary.
The first conversation costs nothing. It is also the most useful one.
Start with a free thirty minute conversation. No obligation.